Standard evaluation format


The structure suggested by the EC is reported below:

  1. Executive Summary
    • The executive summary is a dense, self-standing document which presents the project/programme under evaluation, the purpose of the evaluation, the main information sources and methodological options, and the key conclusions, lessons learned and recommendations.
  2. Tables of contents, figures, acronyms
  3. Introduction
    • Description of the project/programme and the evaluation. The reader is provided with sufficient methodological explanations to gauge the credibility of the conclusions and to acknowledge limitations or weaknesses if there are any.
  4. Answered questions
    • A chapter presents the evaluation questions, together with evidence, reasoning and value judgements pertaining to them. Each question is given a clear and short answer.
  5. Overall assessment
    • A chapter synthesises all answers to evaluation questions in an overall assessment of the project/programme. The evaluation team should not just follow the evaluation questions, the logical framework, or the evaluation criteria. On the contrary, it should articulate all the findings, conclusions and lessons in a way that reflects their importance and facilitates the reading.
  6. Conclusions, lessons and recommendations
    • Conclusions and lessons are listed, clustered and prioritised in a few pages, as are recommendations.
  7. Annexes
    • Terms of reference;
    • list of activities specifically assessed;
    • logical framework and comments;
    • detailed evaluation method including options taken, difficulties encountered and limitations; detail of tools and analyses; list of interviews; list of documents used;
    • Any other text or table which contains facts used in the evaluation.

This website has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Commission. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of punto.sud and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission.